Legal Opinion
State v. Bluhm
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 25, 2004No. C6-02-1775PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
In this appeal by the state, we are asked to decide whether a defendant convicted under Minn.Stat. § 152.025 (2002), who has a previous qualifying controlled substance conviction, must serve a mandatory minimum sentence. In this case, respondent Amber Lynn Bluhm pleaded guilty to fifth-degree controlled substance crime. At her sentencing hearing, the district court stayed imposition of sentence, placed her on three years’ probation, and required her to serve six months in jail. On appeal, the court of appeals held that Minn.Stat. § 152.025, subd. 3(b) (2002), does not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. HumesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Ruiz v. 1st Fidelity Loan Servicing, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Abrahamson v. St. Louis County School DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. BarrientosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.