State v. Stafford
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is a sentencing appeal. William Stafford contends that the sentencing court improperly imposed a consecutive sentence and improperly imposed an executed rather than a stayed sentence. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 13, 1981, Stafford pled guilty to second degree criminal sexual conduct, Minn.Stat. § 609.343(a) (Supp.1981). Imposition of sentence was stayed and Stafford was placed on three years probation. The presumptive sentence was 21 months stayed.
On August 24, 1984, Stafford pled guilty to another charge of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree. He was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. PetersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Moffitt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. FeinsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ArnoldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- State v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. MeechCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. SundstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.