Legal Opinion

State v. Stafford

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1985No. C9-84-2032PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This is a sentencing appeal. William Stafford contends that the sentencing court improperly imposed a consecutive sentence and improperly imposed an executed rather than a stayed sentence. We affirm.

FACTS

On August 13, 1981, Stafford pled guilty to second degree criminal sexual conduct, Minn.Stat. § 609.343(a) (Supp.1981). Imposition of sentence was stayed and Stafford was placed on three years probation. The presumptive sentence was 21 months stayed.

On August 24, 1984, Stafford pled guilty to another charge of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree. He was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. State v. PetersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Moffitt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. FeinsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ArnoldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  2. State v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State v. MeechCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. SundstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. State v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API