Legal Opinion

State v. Olson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 11, 1982No. 82-180, 82-300PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

These cases are appeals by the state from sentences below the minimum terms of imprisonment mandated by Minn.Stat. § 609.-11 (Supp.1981). Subdivision 5 of this statute requires minimum sentences of three years’ imprisonment for certain offenses committed with a firearm. Subdivision 8, however, allows the prosecutor to file a motion for a reduced sentence. “When presented with the motion and if it finds substantial mitigating factors exist, the court shall sentence the defendant without regard to the mandatory minimum terms of imprisonment established by this section.”…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. TenorioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Esteybar v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. LeCompteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API