Legal Opinion

Galli v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1952No. Civ. 14827PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

After demand on, and refusal by, the proper authorities to sue, Iola Galli, as a taxpayer, 1 commenced these actions against the district attorney, the controller and treasurer of the city and county of San Francisco, to recover on behalf of the city the amount of salaries paid to two city and county employees, it being contended that the two employees were hired contrary to the provisions of the city and county charter. 2

The controversy involves the appointment by Edmund Brown, then the district attorney of the city and county of San Francisco, of Roger Garety and William Mullins, it being…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Nicholl v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Welsh v. BramletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Kahn v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ector v. City of TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Wilson v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Younger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. County of San Diego v. MilotzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API