Legal Opinion
Klumb v. Roach
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 26, 1945No. 8494PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought under § 4915 of the Revised Statutes, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, by the plaintiff Klumb, the unsuccessful party in a Patent Office interference, to ajudicate the question of priority between interfering applications for Letters Patent filed by the plaintiff and the defendant Roach. The issues before the District Court related to the question of priority of invention. Such issues were found in favor of the plaintiff and judgment entered accordingly.
Upon appeal to this court, defendants (appellants) on February 5, 1944 moved that the judgment entered by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. HellardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Washington Institute of Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Parker Rust-Proof Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Nachod & United States Signal Co. v. Automatic Signal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Robinson v. WayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Christensson v. HogdalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Shell Development Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation, a Georgia Corporation, Counter-Defendant v. Kai Lieberam, Counter-ClaimantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Paper Container Mfg. Co. v. Dixie Cup Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Shell Development Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.