Legal Opinion
Christensson v. Hogdal
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 25, 1952No. 11320PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent interference case between two- Swedish inventors, in which the immediate question is whether or not the District Court properly held that it was without jurisdiction of the cause, under 35 U.S. C.A. § 72a. The pertinent statutory provision reads:
“Upon the filing of a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia wherein remedy is sought' under section 63 [R.S. § 4915] or [section] 66 [R.S. § 4918] of this title, without seeking other remedy, if it shall appear that there is an adverse party residing in a foreign country,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- James Conolly and Others v. Richard Taylor and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Stone v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States Ex Rel. Baldwin Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Smith v. Carter Carburetor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Shell Development Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Marple Community Record, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- United States v. BosurgiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Madge Schultz v. Wayland SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Marschall v. City of CarsonNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Pure in Heart Baptist Church v. Fulton (In Re Fulton)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.