Robinson v. Wayne
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
The important question of this appeal is whether it appeared from appellant’s complaint in the District Court that there were adverse parties to the suit, residing in a plurality of districts not embraced within the same state.1 Following a three-party interference proceeding in the Patent Office, *768priority was awarded to appellant Robinson on two counts, and to appellee Wayne, on fifteen of the seventeen counts involved in the proceeding. Cannon, the third applicant, received no award. Robinson then commenced suit in the District Court, under Revised Statutes Section…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Geneva Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. S. Karpen & Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Cleveland v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Christensson v. HogdalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Klumb v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- BALLY GAMING, INC. v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Thorne, Neale & Co. v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1943
- Vietti v. WayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.