Shell Development Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
The complaint filed under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, was dismissed for nonjoinder of an indispensable party. 61 F.Supp. 925. Later, counsel for plaintiff apparently representing also two other parties, Standard Oil Development Company- and Texaco Development Company, filed a pleading wherein both voluntarily appeared in this cause, submitted themselves to the jurisdiction, and sought to be made parties defendant. Plaintiff then filed its petition for rehearing on the ground that by such voluntary appearances all indispensable parties were before the court. Defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Klumb v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Shell Development Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shell Development Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Traver Investments, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1962
- Houdry Process Corp. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Paper Container Mfg. Co. v. Dixie Cup Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954