Legal Opinion

Paper Container Mfg. Co. v. Dixie Cup Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 26, 1948No. 9546PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

Paper Container Mfg. Company, the appellant, and Dixie Cup Company, the appellee, were in interference in the United States Patent Office upon the respective applications of Hulseman and Carew. The applications of the two inventors had been previously assigned by them to the parties herein. Priority of invention was awarded Dixie Cup on Carew’s application by the Board of Interference Examiners on July 11, 1946. On January 2, 1947, Paper Con tainer brought suit in the court below against Dixie Cup to obtain a patent under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63. Dixie Cup filed a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lige Estes v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Radio Corporation of America and United States of America v. International Standard Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Turchan v. Bailey Meter Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956
  4. Good v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Etten v. Lovell Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API