Hill v. City of Manhattan Beach
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WRIGHT, C. J.
This action for declaratory relief was brought to test the applicability of zoning and lot-split ordinances of the defendant City of Manhattan Beach to certain land owned by plaintiff. The trial court held that the various ordinances could not constitutionally be applied to plaintiff’s property located in defendant city, that defendant abused its discretion denying plaintiff a variance, and that plaintiff was free to sell and develop the land as two separate building sites. We do not agree and reverse.
The parties have stipulated to the facts. After approval by the city,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Viso v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- County of Los Angeles v. California State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.