Legal Opinion
Viso v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 1979No. Civ. 17568PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
Plaintiff James J. Viso appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants State of California (State) and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) after the trial court sustained demurrers to his third amended complaint in inverse condemnation and deprivation of property without due process of law. We reverse the judgment only as to plaintiff’s cause of action for declaratory relief and injunction. We affirm in all other respects.
Plaintiff’s original complaint named as defendants the State, TRPA, the County of Placer, and Richard M. Heikka. After the complaint was filed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Kawaoka v. City of Arroyo GrandeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Kawaoka v. City of Arroyo GrandeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Weiner v. Mitchell, Silberberg & KnuppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.