Porpora v. Gatliff Building Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellants, Gatliff Building Company and Randy Gatliff, appeal from a decision of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas, denying their motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration. We affirm.
I
{¶ 2} Appellees, Michael and Lori Porpora, entered into a written contract with Gatliff Budding Company for the construction of a home in Wadsworth, Ohio. The contract contained an arbitration clause. On December 22, 2003, appellees filed a complaint against appellants in the Medina County Court of Common Pleas, alleging claims of breach of contract, negligence, misrepresentation,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Collins v. Click Camera & Video, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Akron-Canton Waste Oil, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- David Johnson v. Keybank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Ball v. Ohio State Home Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Post v. Procare Automotive Serv. Solutions, 87646 (5-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Wascovich v. Personacare of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Taylor Building Corp. of America v. BenfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.