Legal Opinion

Akron-Canton Waste Oil, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1992No. Nos. 15230, 15298PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Defendants-appellants, Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc., George Kaiser, Richard Duke (collectively “Safety-Kleen”) and K-Mart Corporation (“K-Mart”), challenge the Summit County Court of Common Pleas’ entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs-appellees, Akron-Canton Waste Oil Company, Inc. and Fred Ambach (collectively “Akron-Canton Waste”), upon claims of defamation, tortious interference with business relations, unfair trade practices, and negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Between them, Safety-Kleen and K-Mart have raised thirteen assignments of error.

The…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. A & B-Abell Elevator Co. v. Columbus/Central Ohio Building & Construction Trades CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Harris v. BornhorstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API