Legal Opinion

Graham v. Sinderman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1927No. Docket No. 144PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is a bill to discharge a forged note and real estate mortgage. Plaintiff Ernest Graham bought lots and erected dwellings thereon. To finance his building operations it was his practice to mortgage lots and receive the money thereon in installments through a loan broker as the work on the building progressed. Mrs. Annie Nippress conducted a loan broker’s office in the city of Grand Rapids, and Mr. Graham procured several loans through her efforts. His practice was to inform the broker of the sum wanted for a particular building, and, when she had arranged for the loan, Mr. Graham and his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. TrumperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Crawford v. HoeftMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Lowther Oil & Gas Co. v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Estep v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  5. King v. De TarNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Karibian v. PalettaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Swartz v. Bank of HaileyvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Bronson v. StetsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Doxtator-Nash Civic Ass'n v. Cherry Hill Professional Building, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API