Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1965No. Calendar 64, Docket 50,587PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Tbe main question presented in tbis appeal is:

“Where a check is given for settlement of a claim in good faith by a defendant to an attorney at law who purports to represent a claimant, and that attorney wrongfully forges tbe client’s name to said check, and keeps tbe entire proceeds thereof, is a later suit by tbe client against tbe defendant barred because of the wrongful acts of tbe attorney

Plaintiff herein on March 25,1961, purchased from defendant a pork roast and by reason of consump tion thereof became violently ill with trichinosis. Plaintiff retained Allen Chalfin and entered into a.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eaton v. KnowlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Peoples State Bank v. BlochMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Wells v. United Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Fetz v. LeyendeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. EstesMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Capital Dredge and Dock Corporation, an Ohio Corporation v. City of Detroit, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Presnell v. Wayne Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Mich. Nat'l Bank of Detroit v. PatmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Nelson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API