Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1965No. Calendar 64, Docket 50,587PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
Tbe main question presented in tbis appeal is:
“Where a check is given for settlement of a claim in good faith by a defendant to an attorney at law who purports to represent a claimant, and that attorney wrongfully forges tbe client’s name to said check, and keeps tbe entire proceeds thereof, is a later suit by tbe client against tbe defendant barred because of the wrongful acts of tbe attorney
Plaintiff herein on March 25,1961, purchased from defendant a pork roast and by reason of consump tion thereof became violently ill with trichinosis. Plaintiff retained Allen Chalfin and entered into a.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eaton v. KnowlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Peoples State Bank v. BlochMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Wells v. United Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Fetz v. LeyendeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Bar Grievance Administrator v. EstesMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Capital Dredge and Dock Corporation, an Ohio Corporation v. City of Detroit, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Presnell v. Wayne Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mich. Nat'l Bank of Detroit v. PatmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Nelson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.