Swartz v. Bank of Haileyville

This action involves the question of a change or alteration of a negotiable instrument. The Bank of Haileyville as plaintiff, defendant in - error herein, instituted an action against H. H. Swartz, plaintiff in error, to recover on a promissory note.

Plaintiff alleged three counts, all based upon the same cause of action. The first count contains allegations to the effect that on June 13, 1926, the defendant, H. H. Swartz, for a valuable consideration, executed and delivered to G. W. Barr his promissory negotiable note for $309.40, due six months after date; that thereafter said Barr, for a…