Bronson v. Stetson
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
The bill was filed to set aside a mortgage on plaintiffs’ land in Flint, which land they had received in exchange for a farm. Mears, plaintiffs’ agent, effected the exchange, and in so doing represented to them that there was a mortgage of nearly $800 on the Flint property, which plaintiffs were to assume, and that the man who held it would •want to turn it over to Union Trust & Savings Bank and get his money. Mears had plaintiffs make and execute a mortgage covering the Flint property to secure a note also made of even date for $800 payable in three years with interest, on which was stated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Johnston Harvester Co v. McLeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Joseph v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Hartington National Bank v. BreslinNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
- First State Savings Bank v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Greer v. ParksMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- First National Bank v. Lovell H. Turnbull Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932