Legal Opinion

Bronson v. Stetson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1930No. Docket No. 71, Calendar No. 34,821PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The bill was filed to set aside a mortgage on plaintiffs’ land in Flint, which land they had received in exchange for a farm. Mears, plaintiffs’ agent, effected the exchange, and in so doing represented to them that there was a mortgage of nearly $800 on the Flint property, which plaintiffs were to assume, and that the man who held it would •want to turn it over to Union Trust & Savings Bank and get his money. Mears had plaintiffs make and execute a mortgage covering the Flint property to secure a note also made of even date for $800 payable in three years with interest, on which was stated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Johnston Harvester Co v. McLeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Joseph v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Hartington National Bank v. BreslinNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. First State Savings Bank v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greer v. ParksMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. First National Bank v. Lovell H. Turnbull Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API