Legal Opinion

Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Scroggin

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 19, 2017No. AC39191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

The defendant, Daniel J. Scroggin also known as Daniel F. Scroggin also known as Daniel Scroggin, appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the substitute plaintiff, AJX Mortgage Trust 1, a Delaware Trust, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, F.S.B., Trustee. 1 The defendant claims that the court improperly granted the plaintiff's motion for judgment of strict foreclosure because (1) the judgment was based upon a default for failure to plead in response to the original complaint, but the plaintiff's predecessor in this action, thereafter, had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Higgins v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Mazulis v. ZeldnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Willamette Management Associates, Inc. v. PalczynskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Webster Bank v. ZakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Kovacs Construction Corp. v. Water Pollution & Control AuthorityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chase Home Finance, LLC v. ScrogginConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. Sovereign Bank v. HarrisonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. Chase Home Finance, LLC v. ScrogginConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  4. Birch Groves Assn., Inc. v. JordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API