Legal Opinion
Tolland Bank v. Larson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 21, 1992No. 10610PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The named defendant,1 Robert G. Larson, appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly rendered judgment after refusing to set aside a default for failure to plead. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are pertinent to our decision. In February, 1991, the plaintiff commenced a foreclosure action against a number of defendants, all of whom were defaulted. The defendant Robert G. Larson appeared pro se and was subsequently defaulted in May, 1991, for failure to plead. The plaintiff filed a motion for judgment of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Snow v. CaliseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Burritt Mutual Savings Bank of New Britain v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- In re DodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Friedlander v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ManiniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Town of Wilton v. McGovernConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Webster Bank v. ZakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Republic Insurance v. Pat Dinardo Auto Sales, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Rogozinski v. American Food Service Equipment Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.