Legal Opinion

Upper Harmony Ditch Company v. Stunkard

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 3, 1972No. 24123PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MR. JUSTICE GROVES.

The plaintiff ditch company sought to enjoin the defendants from diverting water from Ramsey Draw and to obtain damages for such past diversions by the defendants. After certain depositions had been taken, affidavits filed and other documentary evidence was before the court, it granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, stating that the plaintiff might file “amended pleadings or Motion For New Trial within twenty days if it so desires.” Within 20 days plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The defendants again filed a motion for summary judgment, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. PerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Fulton Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  3. Lower Latham Ditch Co. v. Louden Irrigating Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  4. Surface Creek Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. Grand Mesa Resort Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. City of Anchorage v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Aubert v. Town of FruitaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Upper Harmony Ditch Co. v. CarwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Archuleta v. GomezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API