Legal Opinion

Archuleta v. Gomez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 20, 2009No. 08SA109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

Plaintiff/Appellant Ralph L. Archuleta appeals a judgment entered by the District Court for Water Division No. 2. The judgment denied and dismissed Archuleta's complaint for an injunction against Theodore Gomez seeking restoration of three ditch rights-of-way and delivery of water through the ditches. The water court ruled that Gomez adversely possessed, and is now the owner of decreed irrigation water rights deeded to Archuleta in the: (1) Manzanares Ditch No. 1 (priority 26), (2) Archuleta Ditch (priority 30), and (8) Manzanares Ditch No. 2 (priority 31), all diverting from the Huerfano…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Weibert v. Rothe Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Tonko v. MallowSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. Farmers' High Line Canal & Reservoir Co. v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  5. Yunker v. NicholsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1872

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. King Consolidated Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. Stanley Bank v. ParishSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. B.B. & C. Partnership v. Edelweiss Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. 12 CAW Equities v. City of Greenwood VillageColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Archuleta v. GomezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API