Upper Harmony Ditch Co. v. Carwin
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves
This case involves the question of whether the plaintiff ditch company has retained its rights to an easement for a ditch through the defendants’ property, which rights were acquired by the ditch company in 1908. The water division of the district court held that it had retained them. We affirm.
The ditch involved was constructed in 1897 by two persons well-known to students of early Colorado development, C. D. McPhee and J. K. Mullen. McPhee and Mullen owned substantial quantities of Northeastern Colorado land and, in its development, constructed canals and ditches for its irrigation by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sieber v. FrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Harrison v. EverettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Mitchell v. EspinosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- In Re Water Rights of Fort Lyon Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Ruston v. Centennial Real Estate and Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People ex rel. Danielson v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Beaver Park Water, Inc. v. City of VictorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Water Rights of Masters Investment Co. v. Irrigationists Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Bolser v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF GILPINColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Water Rights of Orr v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.