Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. Perry
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 1, 1957No. 17935PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall
The parties appear herein as they .appeared in the trial court. We refer to plaintiff in error as plaintiff and defendants in error as defendants.
Plaintiff instituted this action pursuant to R.C.B. Colo. 105 to have fully adjudicated rights to the following seven mining claims, Copper King, Last Chance, Forest City, Wheatley, Clearfield, Moonlight and McCabee. Defendants answered and asserted superior rights to that portion of six of the claims which lie within the following described lands:
Lot 11, W%SE%, NE%SW14, Section 4; E%NE%, Section ft; Lot 1, WM}NW%, SE^NW^ and W%NE%, Section 9, all…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrison v. EverettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Calvat v. JuhanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Lower Latham Ditch Co. v. Louden Irrigating Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- McDermott v. Bent County Colorado Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Fastenau v. EngelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Department of Health v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Federal Lumber Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Minerals & Chemicals Philipp Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The Milwhite Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Aubert v. Town of FruitaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.