Legal Opinion

Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Fulton Irrigating Ditch Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 10, 1941No. 14,615PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Young

When not herein mentioned by name, the parties will be designated as in the trial court.

The plaintiffs, defendants in error here, instituted an action in the district court of the City and County of Denver, against defendant, plaintiff in error, seeking to have declared abandoned defendant’s water rights as evidenced by a decree for 226.98 second feet of water from the South Platte River for irrigation purposes, which was awarded to its predecessor in title in a water adjudication proceeding terminating in 1883, in which its priority was designated as No. 40, with date of appropriation as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Sieber v. FrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Thomas v. BallMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Drach v. IsolaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  5. In re German Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. City of Anchorage v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Knapp v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  4. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Twin Lakes Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. People ex rel. Danielson v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API