Tollin v. Diamond State Telephone Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Marvel, Vice Chancellor:
Plaintiffs, who are the surviving partners in a business known as Delaware Sports Service, claim to be engaged in the allegedly interstate business of collecting and disseminating to their patrons sporting event news by means of the general telephone exchange system or toll service. They seek injunctive relief against the discontinuance of telephone service presently furnished them by the defendant, The Diamond State Telephone *352Company, such drastic action having been requested of the telephone company by the Attorney General who claims to have reasonable grounds to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Pennsylvania Publications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Pike v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Smith v. Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sokol v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Webb v. Diamond State Telephone CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1967
- In Re Delaware Sports ServiceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
- Pottock v. Continental Can Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
- Pottock v. Continental Can Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.