Pike v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MAYFIELD, Justice.
A statement of this case appears in the dissenting opinion. The primary question here for consideration is whether or not the appellee Telephone Company was justified in removing the appellant’s telephone. The appellee’s asserted justification of this act was that it had received notification from Eugene “Bull” Connor, Commissioner of Public Safety of the City of Birmingham, that this telephone was being used for “illegal purposes”.
It is clear that the Telephone Company, like any other public utility, which .lis granted a monopoly, has a duty to serve !the general public…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BrophyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- City of Birmingham v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Godwin v. Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Andrews v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FergusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ex Parte WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Telephone News System, Inc. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
- Ross Neely Exp., Inc. v. ALA. DEPT. OF ENVIRON. MANAGEMENTSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Humane Soc. of Marshall County v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Friday v. Ethanol Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.