Legal Opinion

Sokol v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1966No. S. F. 22187PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Public Utilities Commission which reaffirms a commission rule requiring a communications utility to summarily discontinue service to a subscriber if advised by any law enforcement agency that the service is being used for unlawful purposes. We conclude that inherent in this naked rule is a constitutional infirmity, but that the defect is not necessarily incurable if the rule is appropriately amended.

Petitioner operated a club which, for dues of five dollars, supplied its members with predictions as to the fleetest horses at local racetracks, an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Viculin v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Endler v. SchutzbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Atkin Wright & Miles v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API