Legal Opinion

Pottock v. Continental Can Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 9, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 1882PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

210 A.2d 295 (1965)

Louis POTTOCK, trading as Pottock's Junk Shop, Plaintiff,

v.

CONTINENTAL CAN CO., Inc., a New York Corporation, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 1882.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

March 9, 1965.

Samuel R. Russell of Bayard, Brill, Russell & Handelman, Wilmington, for plaintiff.

Frank J. Miller, of Walker, Miller & Wakefield, Wilmington, for defendant.

SEITZ, Chancellor:

Plaintiff brought this action against the corporate defendant to enjoin an alleged nuisance and for damages. By way of answer defendant has set up certain affirmative defenses. This opinion is concerned with two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. duPont v. duPontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
  2. Tollin v. Diamond State Telephone Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  3. Pottock v. Continental Can Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eastern Shore Natural Gas Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  2. Webb v. Diamond State Telephone CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1967
  3. Douglas v. ThrasherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  4. Eastern Shore Natural Gas Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
  5. Pottock v. Continental Can Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API