Legal Opinion

Guntert v. Richardson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1964No. 4436PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Guriam.

This is a submission upon an agreed statement of facts. The plaintiffs, who are individual residents, taxpayers and voters of districts hereinafter noted, aver that no further election of members of the State Legislature should be held under existing provisions of law. Defendant, the Lieutenant Governor of Hawaii, charged by law with the responsibility for the conduct of elections, contends that to attempt to change the election process at this time would be contrary to the best interest of the public and that there should be no interference with the 1964 elections. Defendant…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Doremus v. Board of Ed. of HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Roman v. SincockSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Lockert v. CrowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Holt v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1965
  4. State ex rel. Walker v. City of Bowling GreenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Brooks v. HobbieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API