Roman v. Sincock
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren
Presented for decision in this case is the constitutional validity, under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, of the apportionment of seats in the Delaware General Assembly.
I
Shortly after this Court’s decision in Baker v. Carr, 369 U. S. 186, plaintiffs below, residents, taxpayers and qualified voters of New Castle County, Delaware, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, in their own behalf and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, challenging the apportionment of the Delaware Legislature.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sincock v. DuffyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1963
- Sincock v. TerryDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Sincock v. TerryDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Sincock v. TerryDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
3Cited by317 opinions
- Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mahan v. HowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chapman v. MeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
312 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.