Legal Opinion
Meyer v. T-Mobile USA Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 23, 2011No. C 10-05858 CRBPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAYING CASE
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Genevieve Meyer has brought a putative class action against T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile”), alleging four causes of action relating to T-Mobile’s assessment of state and federal surcharges on its bills to subscribers for mobile telephone services. See generally Rivas Decl. (dkt. 20-1) Ex. A (“Complaint”).
Now pending is T-Mobile’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case. See generally Mot. (dkt. 16). T-Mobile argues that Plaintiff is bound to an arbitration agreement,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Loewen v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Imburgia v. DIRECTV, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Hendricks v. At & T Mobility, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Mitchell v. HCL America, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- In re H & R Block Refund Anticipation Loan LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.