Legal Opinion
Imburgia v. DIRECTV, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 7, 2014No. B239361PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTHSCHILD, Acting P. J.
DIRECTV, Inc., moved to dismiss or stay this class action litigation and to compel arbitration. The superior court denied the motion. DIRECTV argues that the motion should have been granted under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 563 U.S._[179 L.Ed.2d 742, 131 S.Ct. 1740] (Concepcion). We conclude that under the terms of the parties’ arbitration agreement, the motion was correctly denied. We therefore affirm.
BACKGROUND
On September 17, 2008, Amy Imburgia filed a class action complaint against DIRECTV, alleging…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Directv, Inc. v. ImburgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. ImburgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Directv, Inc. v. ImburgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- In re H & R Block Refund Anticipation Loan LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Parsons v. John Wieland HomesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.