Legal Opinion

Loewen v. Lyft, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 15, 2015No. Case No. 15-cv-01159-EDLPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS ACTION; DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE SUR-REPLY; GRANTING MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge

I. Introduction

This is a putative class action brought by Plaintiffs Casey Loewen and Jonathan Wright individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against Defendant Lyft, Inc. This Court has previously denied Plaintiffs motion to compel pre-arbitration discovery. Now before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and dismiss the litigation. The Court heard oral…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bekele v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  2. Applebaum v. LYFT, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Esquer v. Educ. Mgmt. Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
  4. Chun Ping Turng v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  5. Bufford v. VXI Global Solutions LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API