Loewen v. Lyft, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS ACTION; DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE SUR-REPLY; GRANTING MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge
I. Introduction
This is a putative class action brought by Plaintiffs Casey Loewen and Jonathan Wright individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against Defendant Lyft, Inc. This Court has previously denied Plaintiffs motion to compel pre-arbitration discovery. Now before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and dismiss the litigation. The Court heard oral…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bekele v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Applebaum v. LYFT, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Esquer v. Educ. Mgmt. Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Chun Ping Turng v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Bufford v. VXI Global Solutions LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.