Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. HCL America, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided June 2, 2016No. 5:15-CV-565-FLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, United States District Judge

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings, made pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 3 and-4. The issues raised have been briefed fujly and are ripe for ruling. For the reasons and on the terms that follow, the court grants defendant’s motion.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Plaintiff filed this suit against defendant, her current employer, on October 23, 2015. Plaintiff asserts six causes of action, including three federal statutory claims for disparate treatment on the…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Forsyth Technical Cmty. Coll.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018
  2. Fluharty v. Peoples Bank, NADistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API