Miller v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
Light bulbs are no trifling matter to the state of Washington. The state buys nearly $300,000 worth each biennium — and the amount will increase steadily in the future. A brace of taxpayers now claim that the state must procure its light bulbs through competitive bid instead of negotiated contracts, the means currently employed.
In 1957, through its Department of General Administration, the state called for competitive bids to supply it with all of the light bulbs required during a 12-month period. About 12 firms put in bids. Platt Electric Supply, Inc., in Seattle, with main offices in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foley Brothers, Inc. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Reiter v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Indianapolis, Columbus & Southern Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Spokane International Railway Co. v. KuykendallWashington Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by11 opinions
- King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Platt Electric Supply, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Tennessee, Inc. v. City of Oak RidgeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
- Savage v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Penpac, Inc. v. Morris County Municipal Utilities AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.