Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spokane International Railway Co. v. Kuykendall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1924No. 17731PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Proceedings were had upon the petition of respondents Spokane & Eastern Railway & Power Company and Inland Empire Paper Company, before the department of public works, under the provisions of §10513, Rem. Comp. Stat. [P. C. §5640], resulting in an order granting the power company permission to install a grade crossing for a spur track of the power company’s railroad across the main line of appellant at Millwood, in Spokane county, this state.

The petition of the power and paper companies set forth the existence of a large paper manufacturing plant owned by the paper company near Millwood, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wooters v. International & G. N. R. R. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Indianapolis, Columbus & Southern Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Mayor & Aldermen of Lowell v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Tidewater Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  5. State ex rel. Tacoma Eastern Railroad v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State ex rel. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Chong Yim v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State Ex Rel. O.W.R. N. Co. v. Dept. of P.W.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Washington Mutual Savings Bank v. Ballard Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API