Legal Opinion
Penpac, Inc. v. Morris County Municipal Utilities Authority
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 2, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
MUIR, Jr., J.A.D.
These consolidated appeals deal with the competitive bidding process set out in the Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:ll-3, -4. We are required to review (1) the propriety of the Morris County Municipal Utilities Authority’s (the Authority) acceptance of an offer to extend a contract for one year beyond its authorized term after it rejected bids for a new contract to provide the services covered by that contract; and (2) the propriety of the Authority’s rejection of all bids on grounds of excessive cost. The trial court ruled…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Township of Hillside v. SterninSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Terminal Construction Corp. v. Atlantic County Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Snyder Realty v. BMW OF N. AMER.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Meadowbrook Carting Co. v. Borough of Island HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Garden State Equality v. DowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- CFG HEALTH SYS. v. County of EssexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- P & A Construction, Inc. v. Township of WoodbridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Garden State Equality v. DowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Social Bicycles LLC v. City of Chicago Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020