Legal Opinion

Savage v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1969No. 39126PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*619Neill, J.

Two taxpayers, through declaratory judgment proceedings against the State of Washington and its Director of the Department of General Administration, attack the validity of a state purchase contract. The contract contains an option provision whereby the state may extend the duration of the purchase agreement for successive 1-year periods to a maximum of 3 additional years beyond the basic 1-year term.1

This is a companion case to Miller v. State, 73 Wn.2d 790, 440 P.2d 840 (1968). The cases were consolidated on appeal for purposes of argument. We affirmed the decree of the trial court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Deaconess Hospital v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Edwards v. City of RentonWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Washington Fruit & Produce Co. v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Marble v. Town of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Equitable Shipyards, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Platt Electric Supply, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Browning-Ferris Industries of Tennessee, Inc. v. City of Oak RidgeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  5. Anderson v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API