Legal Opinion

Reiter v. Chapman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1934No. 24885. Department OnePublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beals, C. J. —

Plaintiff, a taxpayer of the port of Seattle district, instituted this action against the commissioners of the port of Seattle and the Converse Company, Inc., a corporation, for the purpose of obtaining a decree enjoining the performance of written contracts, dated May 25, 1933, between the port of Seattle (hereinafter referred to as the port) and the Converse Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Converse), whereby Converse contends that the port purchased materials comprising a fire-protection system for the Bell Street Terminal, owned and operated by the port, for the sum…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Grace v. ForbesNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Harvey v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Washington Fruit & Produce Co. v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. East Bay Garbage Co. v. Washington Township Sanitation Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hertz Drive-Ur-Self System, Inc. v. Tucson Airport AuthorityArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  5. United States v. Town of North BonnevilleWashington Supreme Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API