Legal Opinion
Almond v. Boyles
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided June 25, 1985No. 84-138-Civ-5PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BRITT, Chief Judge.
This action is brought pursuant to the Randolph-Sheppard Act (Act) by visually handicapped persons who operate vending stands in North Carolina. See 20 U.S.C. §§ 107-107Í. They filed the action on 17 February 1984 against officials of the North Carolina Department of Human Resources (DHR) and the North Carolina Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System (Retirement System). Plaintiffs allege that the defendants have violated their constitutional and statutory rights by unlawfully deducting the “employer” contributions to the Retirement…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Darrell Taylor, D/B/A Darrell Taylor Topographic Charts v. Joseph B. Meirick, D/B/A Lakes IllustratedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Blake v. KlineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Ray Lewis v. Local Union No. 100 of the Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl- CIOCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Committee of Blind Vendors v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement SystemDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- Faulkenbury v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.