Legal Opinion
Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement System
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided September 27, 2012No. Civil Action No. 4:10-cv-02018-JMCPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
J. MICHELLE CHILDS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are retired members of a pension trust plan1 administered by the South Carolina Retirement Systems (“Retirement Systems”) who were rehired on or after July 1, 2005, by employers participating in the Retirement Systems. Plaintiffs bring this action, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, challenging the constitutionality of South Carolina’s State Retirement Systems Preservation and Investment Reform Act (“Act 153”). They specifically allege Act 153 violates their constitutional rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Citizen Center v. GesslerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- McCants v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Pele v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- S.C. Elec. & Gas Co. v. RandallDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.