Legal Opinion

Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1993No. 9110SC1023PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

By this action for declaratory judgment and damages the plaintiffs challenge an amendment, effective 1 July 1982, to the teachers’ and State employees’ retirement disability statute enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly. The trial court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, and denied defendants’ motions to dismiss the lawsuit. From these orders defendants appealed to this Court.

Plaintiff Dorothy M. Faulkenbury was a public school teacher who retired on disability at age 53 in 1983. Because her years of service as of 1 July 1982 and at the time of her…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Birtha v. Stonemor, North Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Housecalls Home Health Care, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. RPR & Associates, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Durham Land Owners Ass'n v. County of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API