Legal Opinion
Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement System
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 5, 2014No. 13-1523PublishedCited by 178 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WYNN and Judge THACKER joined.
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
South Carolina public employees commenced this class action challenging the constitutionality of the South Carolina State Retirement System Preservation and Investment Reform Act, 2005 S.C. Acts 1697 (“the 2005 Act”). That Act amended South Carolina’s retirement laws by requiring public employees who retire and then return to work to make, beginning on July 1, 2005, the same contributions to state-created pension plans as pre-retirement employees but without…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- Williams v. Utah Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Lula Williams v. Big Picture Loans, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Skatemore, Inc. v. Gretchen WhitmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Frederick Allen v. Roy CooperCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States Ex Rel. Oberg v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.