Legal Opinion

Carr v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1991No. 85-1613PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted in a misdemean- or jury trial of unnecessarily failing to provide her dog, named Kim, with proper food and drink, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-801 (1989), and received one year of supervised probation and 100 hours of community service. On appeal, she asserts as a due process violation that the offense of which she was convicted was not properly charged in the information. She further claims that reversible error occurred in the admission of hearsay testimony by a Humane Society officer as to an out-of-court statement concerning the dog’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Battle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Galindo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Ransom v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API