Legal Opinion

Ransom v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1993No. 91-CF-1001PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Associate Judge:

Appellant was charged with armed assault on a police officer (“AAPO”), in violation of D.C.Code § 22-505(b) (1989), assault with a dangerous weapon (“ADW”), in violation of D.C.Code § 22-503 (1989 & 1992 Supp.), and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence (“PFCV”), in violation of D.C.Code § 22-3204(b) (1989 & 1992 Supp.). 1 He was convicted of AAPO and PFCV, but acquitted of the ADW charge, the predicate offense for PFCV. In this appeal appellant contends that since the jury acquitted on the predicate offense, he cannot be convicted of the firearm possession…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. Kenroy Laing, A/K/A Junior Roy Laing, United States of America v. Garfield Dean MartinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  4. Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Whitaker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Bryan BostickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Coghill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. In re C.L.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API