Nathan L. Drew v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McGOWAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction in the District Court on one count of robbery and one count of attempted robbery (22 D.C.Code §§ 2901 and 2902). Appellant moved, both before and at the commencement of trial, to compel separate trials of the two charges; and, after verdict, he moved for a new trial because of prejudice asserted to have occurred in, and by reason of, the joint trial. The failure to grant this relief is said on this appeal to be a source of reversible error 1
Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, set forth in the margin, 2 provides for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. LotschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by811 opinions
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- State v. HamblinOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SchaimOhio Supreme Court · 1992
806 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.