Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Mansi

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 6, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mai/tbie, C. J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon real property made to secure a note for $24,000. The defendants rest their contention upon the fact that the amount actually loaned was $19,000, the balance of the note consisting of a bonus of $4000 and a commission of $1000 for making the loan. Our statute against usury expressly exempts “any bona fide mortgage of real property for a sum in excess of five hundred dollars.” General Statutes, 1918, § 4803, now § 4737 of the Revision of 1930. The classification in the statute by which such mortgages are exempted from its operation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffith v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. State v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  3. State v. GriffithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  4. Contino v. TurelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. State v. WickenhoeferNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ferrigno v. Cromwell Development AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Atlas Realty Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Atlas Realty Corporation v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  4. Columbus Industrial Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. In re Lico Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API