Legal Opinion

Columbus Industrial Bank v. Miller

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1939PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

The plaintiff, an industrial bank organized and doing business under the provisions of General Statutes, Chapter 211, §§ 4031-4041 as amended, brought an action upon a promissory note against five makers. Two of the defendants filed an answer alleging that the plaintiff charged interest at the rate of more than 12 per cent, on the money loaned, and that the note was unenforceable because of usury. The case was tried to the court and judgment rendered in favor of these defendants, from which the plaintiff has appealed. In its assignments of error, the plaintiff claims certain corrections of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griffith v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Underwood Typewriter Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. Donovan v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  4. State v. GannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  5. Stevens v. NeligonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  3. Pietrorazio v. SantopietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. In Re Appeal of DattiloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  5. Bochicchio v. PetrocelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API