Legal Opinion

State v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 18, 1910PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Information for loaning money and charging interest therefor in excess of fifteen per cent per annum, and for taking notes for amounts greater than those loaned, in violation of chapter 238 of the Public Acts of 1907, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and tried to the jury before Burpee, J.; verdict and judgment of guilty, and appeal by the accused.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Section 1 of chapter 238 of the Public Acts of 1907, p. 838, forbids any person, or the agent of any person, with certain named exceptions, from directly or indirectly loaning money at a greater rate of interest than fifteen per cent per annum. Section 2 forbids any person, with intent to evade the provisions of § 1, from accepting a note for a greater 'amount than that actually loaned. Section 4 prescribes that any person violating any of the provisions of §§ 1 or 2 shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months, or fined not more than $1,000, or both. Section 5 provides that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  2. Southern Express Co. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. State v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  4. Chapman v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Blydenburgh v. MilesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mildred Ives v. W. T. Grant CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. State v. HortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API