Contino v. Turello
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWheeleb, C. J.
The defendant indorser’s reasons of appeal support his claims that the note in suit was usurious, because: (1) the plaintiff payee had accepted the note for $6,000, being a larger amount than was loaned thereon, $4,950, and with intent to violate the provisions of General Statutes, § 4798 * and § 4799 † ; (2) the plaintiff demanded payment of the face of the note instead of the amount actually loaned, and with intent to violate General Statutes, § 4798. Further reasons of appeal are: (3) that plaintiff cannot maintain this action because in violation of and prohibited by § 4798 and § 4799,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baggish v. OffengandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Baggish v. OffengandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Devito v. FrebergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mildred Ives v. W. T. Grant CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Bochicchio v. PetrocelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Community Credit Union, Inc. v. ConnorsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Gruber v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- In re Lico Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.